D. Manke*, K. Nehrke**, P. Rösch**, and O. Dössel*
In this initial study the respiratory motion of the heart (coronary
vessels) was analysed and a new motion model described by an affine transformation
was compared to two rigid motion models. The affine transformation model
achieved a better fit (mean error < 1 mm for coronary vessels) than
a rigid motion model describing translation in all directions (mean error
< 2 mm) and a rigid motion model covering only superior-inferior motion
(mean error <6 mm).
Introduction
Cardiac and respiratory motion during the
data acquisition causes serious ghosting and blurring artifacts in coronary
MR imaging. In order to address the motion problem cardiac
triggering and respiratory gating have been introduced
in standard coronary MR protocols [1,2].
MRI - MR imaging sequence
prep - contrast preparation
acq - data acquisition window (~100 ms)
|
Figure 1. Cardiac-triggering in a coronary MR scan: data
is acquired during mid-diastole (low cardiac motion) in several subsequent
cardiac cycles.
Figure 2. Respiratory gating: Respiratory motion of the right
hemidiaphragm is measured during the examination. A linear correlation
between motion of the diaphragm and the heart is assumed. Acquired data
is only accepted if the navigator position is in the respiratory gating
window. Otherwise data is rejected and has to be remeasured.
Since only a short time window of ~100 ms is used for data acquisition
in the cardiac R-R interval (~1000 ms) cardiac imaging suffers from low
scan efficiency and long scan times. Scan time is further increased by
a factor of 2 to 3 by the use of respiratory gating. In consequence a high
resolution 3D scan of one coronary vessel for example lasts approximately
10 to 15 minutes.
Prospective motion correction, which is done in real-time during data
acquisition, provides the opportunity to increase the respiratory gating
window without loss of image quality. Up to now, only translation of the
heart in superior-inferior direction is corrected in common cardiac MR
examinations by using a rigid-body-motion model (slice-tracking). However,
prospective motion correction in MRI provides the capability to perform
corrections based on the more general affine transformation model. In the
present work the feasibility of this model for respiratory motion of the
heart was studied.
Methods
Imaging
Experiments on several healthy volunteers were
performed on a clinical scanner (Philips ACS-NT15). The proximal portions
of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left anterior descending artery
(LAD) were imaged in different respiratory phases. A standard segmented
k-space 3D gradient echo sequence was used (TR = 8.6 ms, TE = 3.2 ms, flip
angle = 30°). 20 slices were acquired per 3D stack (FOV = 360x270 mm²,
slice thickness = 1.5 mm, 512x384 matrix).
A T2-preparation pulse and a fat-saturation pulse were applied for
contrast enhancement.
Respiratory motion was monitored by a pencil beam navigator placed
through the right hemidiaphragm. In order to cover different respiratory
phases the navigator gating window was shifted from end-expiration towards
inspiration for subsequent scans. Two corresponding images
of the RCA of one volunteer are shown below.
Figure 3. The RCA of one healthy volunteer for end-expiration
(left) and inspiration (20mm shift of the right hemidiaphragm) (right).
Motion Registration
For motion registration the images acquired in
end-expiration were chosen as reference. In these reference images several
characteristic landmarks were selected manually. Corresponding landmark
positions for the inspiratory motion states were registered automatically
using a block matching algorithm [3].
Motion Models
Two sets of corresponding landmark positions for
end-expiration and inspiration were used to determine the parameters of
different motion models for the respiratory motion of the heart. The matrices
|
and |
(1) |
contain corresponding landmark positions for end-expiration (ex) and inspiration (in)
|
and |
(2) |
in homogeneous coordinates [
4].
The following motion models have been examined:
(a) Translation only in superior-inferior direction
(b) 3D translation
(c) 3D affine transformation (translation + linear transformation)
Parameters for the translational motion models (a) and (b) were calculated
by taking the mean values of the x,y,z-components of the difference vectors
between corresponding landmarks:
|
 |
(3) |
The optimum parameters for the affine transformation model (c) described
by square matrix
Acorr were determined by
|
 |
(4) |
The affine transformation
Acorr maps the inspiratory motion state
(in) to the end-expiratory reference state (ex).
Results
During tidal breathing (up to 20 mm diaphragm shift)
the RCA is shifted up to 10 mm in superior-inferior direction, which is
the 3fold diameter of the coronary vessel. While anterior-posterior motion
seems to be irrelevant for the RCA for tidal breathing (shift < 1 mm
for this volunteer) , the RCA moves ~5 mm to the right during inspiration
of this volunteer. Displacements for LAD are similar (9.1 mm inferior,
3.0 mm anterior, 4.0 mm right) except anterior motion, which is approximately
the diameter of the vessel.
Linear deformations can be observed especially for the RCA, where linear
expansion in superior-inferior direction seems to be the most important
component.
For LAD these linear deformations are not as strong as for RCA but
are still relevant.
Comparison of Motion Models
Landmarks found for RCA and LAD of one volunteer for end-expiration and
inspiration (20 mm shift of the right hemidiaphragm) were used for the
3D plots shown below (Figure 4, Figure
5, Figure 6).
(a) Translation in superior-inferior direction:
This motion model is commonly used in coronary MR examinations, where a
fixed correction factor between right hemidiaphragm and heart is used [5].
In this example a mean displacement in superior direction of each vessel
was calculated with equation (3) (RCA: 10.3 mm, LAD:
9.1 mm) and applied for correction. The corrected vessels do not fit very
well to the reference state, the mean distance between corresponding landmarks
is still 5.9 mm for RCA and 5.1 mm for LAD.
 |
 |
RCA | LAD |
Figure 4. Coronary vessels in different respiratory states (end-expiration
(black), 20mm inspiration
(blue)) and correction
of superior-inferior translation (orange).
(b) 3D Translation:
A better fit can be achieved by a model that considers all components of
translation. The mean displacement for each vessel (RCA: 10.3 mm inferior,
0.1 mm anterior, 5.5 mm right; LAD: 9.1 mm inferior, 3.0 mm anterior, 4.0
mm right) was calculated using equation (3) and applied
for correction. The mean distances between corresponding landmarks of the
corrected vessels and the reference state are 1.9 mm for RCA and 1.3 mm
for LAD.
 |
 |
RCA | LAD |
Figure 5. Coronary vessels in different respiratory
states (end-expiration (black), 20mm
inspiration (blue)) and correction
of 3D translation (orange).
(c) 3D affine transformation:
Best results were achieved using a 3D affine transformation model since
it provides most degrees of freedom. Model parameters were determined using
Equation (4). The mean distances between corresponding landmarks of the
corrected vessels and the reference state are 0.3 mm for RCA and 0.4 mm
for LAD in this example, which is significantly below the vessel diameter.
 |
 |
RCA | LAD |
Figure 6. Coronary vessels in different respiratory states (end-expiration
(black), 20mm inspiration
(blue)) and correction
of affine transformation (orange).
Conclusions
In the present study respiratory motion of
the coronary arteries was examined. The common rigid motion model including
only translation in superior-inferior direction is not able to describe
respiratory motion of the heart properly. An extension to a 3D translation
or a 3D affine transformation improves the model fit significantly.
The motion model could be used for prospective motion correction during
high resolution coronary MR scans. In consequence, the respiratory gating
window could be increased substantially. This could reduce scan time significantly.
In a clinical application model parameters will have to be determined
in a preparation phase in a simpler way than performed in this study. In
addition a priori information described by a motion model will have to
be used and only a few patient dependent parameters of the model will be
adapted.
References
[1] Stuber, M. et al., "Double-oblique free-breathing
high resolution magnetic resonance angiography", Journal of American College
of Cardiology, vol.34, p.524, 1999.
[2] Sachs, T.S. et al., "Real-time motion detection
in spiral MRI using navigators", Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol.32,
p.639, 1994.
[3] Rösch, P., Weese, J., Netsch, T.,
Quist, M., Penney, G.P. and Hill, D.L.G., "Robust 3D deformation
field estimation by template propagation", submitted to MICCAI 2000.
[4] Jähne, B., "Digital image processing",
4th Edition, Springer, 1997.
[5] Wang, Yi, Riederer, S.J. and Ehman, R.L., "Respiratory
motion of the heart: kinematics and the implications for the spatial resolution
in coronary imaging", Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol.33, p.713, 1995.